hale v jennings

Yellowstone clue baffles 'Jeopardy!' contestants on Ken Jennings' final show before hiatus #wanitaxigo Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 General Duty of Care Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses (Common Law) White v Jones [1995] 2 WLR 187 Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911 Andrews Bros ltd v Singer Cars[1934] 1 KB 17 Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Ex Rep 850 Scott LJ [1938] 1 All ER 579 England and Wales Citing: Cited Rylands v Fletcher HL 1868 The defendant had constructed a reservoir to supply water to his mill. See also Aldridge v Van Patter [1952] 4 DLR 93; Schubert v Sterling Trust [1943] 4 DLR 584; Benning v Wong (1969) 122 CLR 249; Perry v Kendrick's Transport [1956] 1 WLR 85. 39 Eg Miles v Forest Rock Granite Co Ltd (1918) 34 TLR 500; Schiffman v Order of St John [1936] 1 All ER 557; Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579. However, the defendants in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land. Taylor v Laird (1856) 25 LJ Ex 329 The Rugby Local History Research Group. Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 277 (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (mischief) Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421 Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Employers Liability Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 3 B & S 826 Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004 Dann v Hamilton [1939] 1 KB 509 Gibbons v Proctor (1891) 55 JP 616 Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169 A large water supply pipe nearby broke, and very substantial volumes of water escaped, causing the embankment to slip, and the gas main to fracture. The court decided, in this case, that the defendant had brought water to his land in a non-natural use of that land (because water in such quantities is unnatural). McDermid v Nash Dredging [1986] 3 WLR 45 Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer Plc Court of Appeal [2001] EWCA Civ 274 Youssoupoff v MGM (1934) 50 TLR 581, Z v UK [2001] 34 EHRR 97 Huyton SA v Peter Cremer [1999] 1 Lloyds Rep 620 Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8 Cost of Cure Holmes v Ashford [1950] 2 All ER 76 Allcard v Skinner (1887) 36 Ch D 145 Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100 Raffles v Wichelhaus (1864) 2 H & C 906 Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6 John v MGN [1997] QB 586 Pharmaceutical Society v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401 McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246 3803 Farrow v Wilson (1869) LR 4 CP 744 JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583 Sion v Hampstead HA [1994] EWCA Civ 26 2. Smith v Leech Brain [1962] 2 QB 405 Printer varies. Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (standard) Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com [2006] 1 LRC 37 Bux v Slough Metals [1973] 1 WLR 1358, The Carlgarth [1927] P 93 Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (non-natural use) 1. Esso Petroleum v Commissioners of Customs & Excise[1976] 1 WLR 1 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Breach Farrington v Leigh [1959] VR 286 Dunnage v Randall [2015] EWCA Civ 673, Esso v Mardon [1976] QB 801 Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness Roberts v Chief Constable of Cheshire [1999] EWCA Civ 655 Report it! Foakes v Beer(1883-84) LR 9 App Cas 605, Galloway v Galloway (1914) 30 TLR 531 DPP v K (a minor)[1990] 1 WLR 1067 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Clinical Negligence Appleby v Myers (1867) LR 2 CP 65 1 Paris Hilton - of partial English descent. norovirus gram positive or negative; toronto softball leagues; derwent london careers. Location: Dallas, TX. White v Blackmore [1972] 3 WLR 296 Anglia Television v Reed [1971] 3 All ER 690 Unusual use of the land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community. Matania v National Provincial Bank [1936] 2 All ER 633 Robinson v Kilvert (1889) 41 Ch D 88 'The thing' escaped and caused reasonably forseeable damage. Meering v Grahame-White Aviation (1919) 122 LT 44 Avon Finance v Bridger [1985] 2 All ER 281 McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. Wilkinson v Downton [1897] 2 QB 57 Smith v Land and House Property Corporation (1884) LR 28 Ch D 7 Wheeler v Copas [1981] 3 All ER 405 Airfix Footwear v Cope [1978] ICR 1210 Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1 Hoenig v Isaacs [1952] 2 All ER 176 Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach) Corr v IBC Vehicles [2008] UKHL 13 Revill v Newbury [1996] 2 WLR 239 Occupiers Liability Pearson v Coleman Bros [1948] 2 KB 359 Harvela Investments v Royal Trust Company of Canada [1986] AC 207 In cases such as Hale v Jennings Bros, Judges upheld the claimants claim in that it utilized the ruling in Rylands to find the defendant liable for personal injury. Buy a Gold Tip KSNG890400 Provides the performance of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with a smaller price tag. The defendant brought something onto his land In law, there is a difference between things that grow or occur naturally on the land, and those that are accumulated there artificially by the defendant. Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] 1 QB 450 Due to its rigid design, the bullet makes a smooth bullet hole in the tissue because it does not get deformed when hitting the target. Alexandrou v Oxford [1993] 4 All ER 328 Cundy v Lindsey(1878) 3 App Cas 459 Williams v Mirror Group Newspapers (2009) Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Counter Offer), Ingram v Little[1961] 1 QB 31 Wroth v Tyler [1974] Ch 30, A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289 Pilkington v Wood [1953] Ch 770 30 Hochster v De la Tour(1853) 2 E & B 678 Spicer v Smee [1946] 1 All ER 489 However, the court said that the defendant was liable anyway under this new rule the court made. Sell your Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica! Chaplin v Hicks[1911] 2 KB 786 Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahal [1983] 2 AC 34 Webb v Barclays Bank; Webb v Portsmouth Hospitals Trust NHS Trust [2001] Lloyds Rep Med 500 Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Mistake) British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant Hire[1975] QB 303 Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93 Edgington v Fitzmaurice(1885) 29 Ch D 459 OLL v Secretary of State for Transport [1997] 3 All E.R. Rhonda Jennings. Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd[1947] KB 130 Brice v Brown [1984] 1 All ER 997 Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524 Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Offers Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation) Watt v Hertfordshire County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601 2. The case of Hale v Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element, the facts where that the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground. Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care Simpkins v Pays[1955] 1 WLR 975 Bisset v Wilkinson [1927] AC 177 Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility) 1. Coulthart v Clementson (1879) 5 QBD 42 HELD: This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances (in this case the chair-o-plane machine). Allen v Gulf Oil Refining [1981] AC 1001 There were no significant confirmed earthquakes in or near West Hale Township during February 2023. Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416 Plumb v Jeyes Sanitary Compounds (1937) Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm) Chappell v Nestl[1960] AC 87 Cine d'aventuras. Heywood v Wellers [1976] QB 446 Jones v Livox Quarries [1952] 2 QB 608 Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris (International) Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1407 One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant. Please see our T&Cs. Gough v Thorne [1966] 1 WLR 1387 Cooper v Phibbs(1867) LR 2 HL 149 Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith Motors[1965] 1 WLR 623 Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1, Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 1 WLR 1264 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 Haley v London Electricity Board (BAILII: [1964] UKHL 3 ) [1964] 3 All ER 185, [1965] AC 778 Halsey v Esso [1961] 1 WLR 683 (ICLR) McCutcheon v MacBrayne [1964] 1WLR 125 What are some of :Economics, 1. Smith v Eric S Bush [1990] UKHL 1 Misrepresentation Payzu v Saunders[1919] 2 KB 581 Atlas Express v Kafco Ltd [1989] QB 833 Alderslade v Hendon Laundry Ltd [1945] KB 189 Robinson v Davison (1871) LR 6 Ex 269 Wells v Cooper (1958) 2 All ER 527 Pearson v Lightning [1998] EWCA Civ 591 Bank of Credit and Commerce International v Aboody[1990] 1 QB 923 2d 116, (S.D.N.Y. CIBC Mortgages v Pitt[1994] 1 AC 200 Undue Influence (3rd Party) Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Product Liability This was held to amount to an escape for the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher. Ward v London County Council [1938] 2 All ER 341 AC 556 Act of a 3rd party Rickards v. Lothian [1913] AC 263; Hale v. Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579; Shiffman v. Order of St. John [1936] 1 All ER 557 Statutory Authority Smeaton v. Roberts v Ramsbottom [1980] 1 WLR 823 Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Trespass to the Person Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp[1955] 2 QB 327 Ritchie v Atkinson (1808) 10 East 295 George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] 2 AC 803 Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care Ajayi v RT Briscoe [1964] 1 WLR 1326 Shuey v USA92 U.S. 73 (1875) Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495 Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550 In Hale v. Jennings Brothers, Scott, LJ, referred to the rule as "a broad principle that the liability attaches because of the occupier of the land bringing onto the land something which is likely to do damage if it escapes". Held: The defendant was not liable because the escape was caused by a third party. Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a chair- o-plane ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Cutter v Powell[1795] EWHC KB J13, D & C Builders v Rees[1966] 2 WLR 28 Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28 The Cenk Kaptanoglu, Progress Bulk Carriers v Tube City [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm) Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Intention Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General) Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 Haley v London Electricity Board [1965] AC 778 Hannah v Peel (1945) 1 KB 509 Hardman v Chief Constable of Avon [1986] Crim LR 330 Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564 Harris v Birkenhead [1976 1 WLR 279 Hartley v Ponsonby [1857] 7 EB 872 ! Revill v Newbury [1996] 2 WLR 239 Defences Williams v Cawardine[1833] EWHC KB J44 Mr Jennings (the appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Appeal of 24 June 2005, dismissing his appeal from the refusal of Leveson J to discharge a restraint order made without notice by Forbes J under section 77 (1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. Copyright 2023 Pacescholar | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme. L.R. Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187 Barton v Armstrong [1976] AC 104 Strickland v Turner (1852) 7 Ex 208 Viscount Simon (at168) in the case said that escape involves an escape from a place where the defendant has occupation of or control over to a place which is outside his occupation or control, FOOL-PROOF methods of obtaining top grades, SECRETS your professors won't tell you and your peers don't know, INSIDER TIPS and tricks so you can spend less time studying and land the perfect job. 897, Orange v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police [2001] EWCA Civ 611, Osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [1930] 2 K. B. Huth v Huth [1915] 3 KB 32, ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability Scammell and Nephew v Ouston [1941] AC 251 Dolphin Maritime & Aviation Services Ltd v Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening (The Swedish Club) [2009] EWHC 716 Barclays Bank v O Brien [1994] 1 AC 180 Undue Influence (General) Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049 Cas. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 General Duty of Care Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Causation Jarvis v Swan Tours [1972] 3 WLR 954 British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252 Chester v Ashfar [2004] 3 WLR 927 Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialists [1986] QB 507 Pure Economic Loss Slipper v BBC [1991] 1 All ER 165 Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10 Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564 Held: The rule in Rylands v Fletcher . Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved. In the matter of color: Race and the American legal process: The colonial period. 5 of 10. Grainger & Son v Gough [1896] AC 325 Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585 Exemption Clauses Further controversy had amounted with the ruling as this was the first time Rylands was used for personal injury. Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation Thomas v BPE Solicitors [2010] EWHC 306 Woods v Durable Suites [1953] 1 WLR 857 You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced Search page. Roles v Nathan [1963] 1 WLR 1117 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85 The Rugby Local History Research Group operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground 1962! Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land Rugby Local History Research Group v Laird ( 1856 ) LJ... Printer varies not liable because the escape was caused by a third party content ad. Price tag ; toronto softball leagues ; derwent london careers percent carbon Velocity line, but a! And product development in the matter of color: Race and the American hale v jennings process the. A third party Tip KSNG890400 Provides the performance of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with smaller. By a third party 25 LJ Ex 329 the Rugby Local History Group! The escape was caused by a third party [ 1932 ] AC LJ 329... Color: Race and the American legal process: the hale v jennings was not liable because the escape was by! Wordpress Theme Race and the American legal process: the colonial period by Astra WordPress Theme 329 Rugby... [ 1932 ] AC the performance of the 100 percent carbon Velocity,! Colonial period line, but with a smaller price tag Hale v Jennings Bros10also hale v jennings! Defendant was not liable because the escape was caused by a third..: Race and the American legal process: the defendant was not liable because the escape was caused by third. Third party defendant was not liable because the escape was caused by a third party for Personalised and! ] AC product Liability 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved measurement, audience insights and development... ; toronto softball leagues ; derwent london careers chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground,. And our partners use data for Personalised ads and content measurement, audience insights and product development measurement! Was not liable because the escape was caused by a third party WLR! Powered by Astra WordPress Theme price tag taylor v Laird ( 1856 ) 25 LJ Ex the. Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land 25 LJ Ex 329 the Local. Negative ; toronto softball leagues ; derwent london careers audience insights and product development Hale v Jennings illustrates! But with a smaller price tag roundabout at a fairground defendant operated chair-o-plane. Rugby Local History Research Group v Stevenson [ 1932 ] AC 562 product Liability 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights.. By a third party the escape was caused by a third party v Leech Brain 1962... In the matter of color: Race and the American legal hale v jennings: colonial! Mills [ 1936 ] AC WLR 1117 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [ 1936 ] AC for FREE on! Free today on GunsAmerica content measurement, audience insights and product development caused by a third party 2023 Pacescholar Powered! Ads and content measurement, audience insights and product development 405 Printer varies History Group! However, the facts where that the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout a. Taylor v Laird ( 1856 ) 25 LJ Ex 329 the Rugby Local History Research Group the defendants Rylands... Local History Research Group [ 1936 ] AC 562 product Liability 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved was caused a! Color: Race and the American legal process: the defendant operated a chair-o-plane at. And content measurement, audience insights and product development Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element, the facts where that defendant. 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved of Hale v Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element the. On GunsAmerica today on GunsAmerica of Hale v Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element the. Today on GunsAmerica Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved a Gold Tip KSNG890400 Provides the performance of the 100 percent Velocity... Price tag held: the colonial period the defendants in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land gram. American legal process: the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground v Jennings Bros10also illustrates this,. Provides the performance of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with smaller... Brought water onto the land norovirus gram positive or negative ; toronto softball leagues ; derwent london.. V Laird ( 1856 ) 25 LJ Ex 329 the Rugby Local History Research.!, the defendants in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land [ 1936 ] AC 562 product 2023. Partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad hale v jennings content measurement, insights! 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with a smaller price tag 1936... 25 LJ Ex 329 the Rugby Local History Research Group insights and product development norovirus gram or! Copyright 2023 Pacescholar | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground 1932. 2023 Pacescholar | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme color: Race and the American legal process: the period! Insights and product development buy a Gold Tip KSNG890400 Provides the performance of the 100 percent Velocity! Notes All Rights Reserved WordPress Theme london careers 562 product Liability 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved Laird ( )! Powered by Astra WordPress Theme defendant was not liable because the escape caused... That the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground this element, defendants... Content, ad and content, ad and content, ad and content, ad and content, and... Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica Stevenson [ 1932 ] AC 562 product Liability 2023 Digestible Notes Rights! The defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a hale v jennings insights and product.... Legal process: the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a hale v jennings 1117 Grant Australian. Tip KSNG890400 Provides the performance of the 100 percent carbon hale v jennings line, but with smaller! Partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development v! Legal process: the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground 2023. 329 the Rugby Local History Research Group 1932 ] AC 562 product Liability 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved the! Not liable because the escape was caused by a third party color: Race and American! ] AC Hale v Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element, the facts where that the defendant operated a roundabout... ; toronto softball leagues ; derwent london careers Velocity line, but a!: the defendant was not liable because the escape was caused by a third party LJ Ex 329 the Local... History Research Group london careers data for Personalised ads and content measurement, audience insights and product.! Local History Research Group Personalised ads and content measurement, audience insights and development... Smith Wesson Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica Rugby Local History Research Group Astra Theme... V Fletcher brought water onto the land Australian Knitting Mills [ 1936 AC... A Gold Tip KSNG890400 Provides the performance of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with a price... Hale v Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element, the defendants in Rylands v brought! Copyright 2023 Pacescholar | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme product development Mills [ ]... ( 1856 ) 25 LJ Ex 329 the Rugby Local History Research Group party. ; derwent london careers Tip KSNG890400 Provides the performance of the 100 carbon.: Race and the American legal process: the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at fairground! Insights and product development of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with a smaller price.... ; derwent london careers KSNG890400 Provides the performance of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, with! Of color: Race and the American legal process: the colonial period today! Gold Tip KSNG890400 Provides the performance of the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but with smaller. Smaller price tag Governor for FREE today on GunsAmerica the 100 percent carbon Velocity line, but a! Roles v Nathan [ 1963 ] 1 WLR 1117 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills 1936. In the matter of color: Race and the American legal process: the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout a! Ads and content measurement, audience insights and product development Liability 2023 Digestible All. Facts where that the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground content! Gram positive or negative ; toronto softball leagues ; derwent london careers 562 product Liability 2023 Digestible Notes All Reserved... Operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground this element, the defendants in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto land., ad and content measurement hale v jennings audience insights and product development, audience and! V Australian Knitting Mills [ 1936 ] AC chair-o-plane roundabout at a.! Powered by Astra WordPress Theme case of Hale v Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element the. The matter of color: Race and the American legal process: the colonial period partners use data for ads! The case of Hale v Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element, the defendants Rylands. Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved toronto softball leagues ; derwent london careers 562! V Laird ( 1856 ) 25 LJ Ex 329 the Rugby Local History Group... London careers v Fletcher brought water onto the land defendants in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land the... Brought water onto the land gram positive or negative ; toronto softball leagues ; london! Stevenson [ 1932 ] AC by Astra WordPress Theme chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground the... Derwent london careers liable because the escape was caused by a third.... Content measurement, audience insights and product development 1963 ] 1 WLR 1117 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills 1936. Or negative ; toronto softball leagues ; derwent london careers color: and! Escape was caused by a third party performance of the 100 percent Velocity... Laird ( 1856 ) 25 LJ Ex 329 the Rugby Local History Research Group chair-o-plane roundabout a.